Subscribe to Website Updates

Enter your email address to receive a notification when new content is published to our website.

Join 164 other subscribers

Body-Worn Camera Program

** 6/9/2020 Update **

As of Monday, 6/8/2020, the Richmond Heights Police Department’s Body-Worn Camera program has been fully implemented.

The Richmond Heights Police Department has developed a culture of high-level customer service, fair and impartial policing, and the use of force only when necessary. The officers’ actions are a matter of public record and the department welcomes the opportunity for increased transparency through the use of body-worn cameras (BWCs).

In early 2018, The Richmond Heights Police Department partnered with the Regional Justice Information Services (REJIS) and the US Department of Justices’ Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), to begin our BWC program.  Spearheading the program in the fall of 2017, REJIS was awarded $350,000 in grant funding for the purchase of BWCs for participating police agencies within St. Louis County.  This BJA grant award was unique as it was one of the first to take a regional approach to BWC acquisition, as opposed to each agency filing for federal funds individually. Additionally, during the application phase of this grant, the St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney’s office, the 21st Circuit Court (St. Louis County), and the US Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Missouri all wrote letters of support for the program.

The result of this program was the purchase and future deployment of 247 BWCs for the following seven (7) participating St. Louis County Municipal Police Departments:

  • Bellefontaine Neighbors PD
  • Brentwood PD
  • Clayton PD
  • Moline Acres PD
  • Richmond Heights PD
  • Town & Country PD
  • University of Missouri – St. Louis (UMSL) PD

The following is the Richmond Heights BWC Projected Deployment Timeline*:

  • Delivery of BWC equipment: April 2020 (Completed)
  • Server Configuration and Testing: April 2020 (Completed)
  • Training and Issuing of BWCs to Officers: May 2020 (Completed)
  • BWC Program Fully Operational: June 2020 (Completed on 6/8/2020)

*  Dates are subject to change due to technical issues or other complications outside of our control

Community involvement is critical to any successful BWC program.  The Richmond Heights Police Department has developed a thorough policy regarding the use of BWCs.  A link to our draft policy can be found below. Under this link, you will find a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section that may answer some of the questions you may already have.  Lastly, we would like to invite our community to review this policy and provide any input by using the form at the bottom of this page. You may also contact the Chief of Police with any questions.

Richmond Heights Body-Worn Camera Policy (link opens in new tab)

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, you can view our policy at the following link: Body-Worn Camera Policy
All members of the police department, with the exception of the Chief, will be issued BWCs.
RHPD’s BWC Policy contains a detailed list of situations for which a BWC should be activated.  Essentially, an officer shall continuously record any incident in which an officer has reasonable suspicion or probable cause that a crime has occurred.
Much of the work an officer completes throughout a shift can be considered administrative in nature (report writing, paperwork, etc). There are also times during an officer’s shift where they may have an expectation of privacy. Additionally, requiring the continuous recording of an entire 12-hour shift would put an unnecessary strain on system resources (e.g., storage space, video management).
BWC video will be stored on a server located within the police department.
All BWC recordings not scheduled for court proceedings, litigation holds, active investigations or departmental uses shall be maintained for 30 days in accordance with the Missouri Police Clerks Records Retention Schedule (PDF).
Officers are not obligated to announce if they have activated their BWC.
This depends on the situation. There may be times when an individual may not wish to be recorded, especially in locations where they may have an expectation of privacy (such as a residence). If the officer feels that stopping the recording will not in any way hamper the investigation, then the officer may choose to turn off the BWC. However, officers are not obligated to stop the recording of incidents involving an investigation, lawful search, arrest or other circumstances that clearly dictate that continued recording is necessary.
Yes. However, in locations where individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as a residence, individuals may request that an officer not record them. Officers will evaluate each situation and when an officer deems it appropriate, may honor the individual’s request.
It depends on the situation. Individuals may request that an officer not record them. Officers will evaluate each situation and when an officer deems it appropriate, may honor the individual’s request.
Generally, no. RHPD’s primary use of the cameras will be in situations when officers are responding to calls for service and during law enforcement-related activities, such as traffic stops, arrests, searches, interviews, and pursuits.
Requests for video are subject to the Missouri Sunshine Law.  Additionally, one of the most critical issues for people interacting with police is privacy.  People often need to seek police assistance when they are going through difficult personal challenges.  Certain groups of citizens have strong specific privacy protections – particularly juveniles. Victims also have privacy protections in the law.
While BWC’s can be a useful tool and can provide a unique perspective on police encounters, there are limitations:
  1. Body-worn cameras cannot capture what happened outside of the camera’s view or potentially the causation for actions shown depending on the camera’s perspective and breadth of view.  How the camera is mounted and the angle at which the camera is mounted all affects the perception of what is seen (officer vs. suspect perspective).
  2. Some important danger cues can’t be recorded (tensing of muscles, pulling away, etc.)
  3. Night vision component of a camera can see far better than the human eye.
  4. An officer’s body may block the view of the camera.